How White Billionaire Democrats are Ravaging Black Dallas

• Black Dallas overwhelmingly supports educational freedom and a well-funded responsible police.

• The Democratic-run City Council consistently votes to keep our kids in failing schools and defund police in our neighborhoods. They do it because white billionaire Democratic donors like Charles Butt, Mark Cuban, George Soros are driving the agenda.

• We don’t know whether these billionaires are pursuing racist policies out of hate or perhaps a desire to profit. But they should not be dictating our future.

We have long since cast our vote in favor of educational freedom and well-funded, responsible policing. We see the direct link between access to quality education and a safer, stronger community. But our so-called “representatives” in the Democratic-run City Council don’t seem to get the memo, do they?

Instead, they persist in keeping our children in failing schools and divesting funds from police departments that are supposed to protect our neighborhoods. It begs the question: who are they actually representing? They are representing the billionaires behind the scenes pulling the strings. Are these billionaires racist or mere profiteers? That is open to interpretation. What is not is the destructive impact they have had on black communities in Dallas.

The Billionaire Puppeteers

Meet the patrons of this tragic theater: Charles Butt, Mark Cuban, George Soros, among others. Their money speaks volumes, but their actions scream contradictions. They’re pulling the strings, and the City Council and local school boards dance to their tune, blissfully tone-deaf to the voices of the very people they were elected to serve.

Charles Butt: The Left’s South Paw Provocateur

Charles Butt, the seemingly benign grocery magnate, has positioned himself as a beneficent funder of public education.  Yet, a closer examination of where his money flows reveals a landscape not of educational opportunity for all, but of an elitist monopoly that perpetuates the status quo and stops educational opportunity for black students. His financial backing often veers into racist agendas providing the capital that helps maintain failing public schools under the guise of ‘reform.’ It’s as if he’s the proud sponsor of a sinking ship, offering life jackets only to a select few while claiming to care for everyone on board. This is not philanthropy; it’s social engineering with a hefty price tag—funded by you, me, and every taxpayer.

Mark Cuban’s Philanthropy—A Generosity of Constraints?

Cuban has voiced strong opposition to school choice, an educational initiative widely supported within the Black community. School choice offers options for those in underprivileged areas, freeing them from the limitations of zip code-dictated education. Yet, Cuban’s philanthropy seems strangely silent on this pressing issue, focusing more on flashy, high-profile donations than the day-to-day battles for educational justice. What’s worse, by maintaining this stance, he’s essentially endorsing the status quo—a failing educational system that disproportionately affects Black students. So, one must ask: is Cuban’s philanthropy truly in the service of the greater good or a well-orchestrated PR campaign that sustains the existing power structures?

The Soros Paradox: Undermining Law and Order in the Name of Social Justice?

George Soros and his son have long been figures at the forefront of philanthropy, pouring funds into social justice movements and political campaigns. While their financial support has often been touted as a driver for positive change, a critical examination reveals a different story. Take, for example, their significant contributions to campaigns that installed progressive District Attorneys across the nation. On the surface, this might seem like a step towards a more equitable justice system. However, the reality is far more complex and, in some instances, deeply troubling.

A case in point is District Attorney John Creuzot in Dallas, who has been a glaring example of the Soros-funded progressive experiment gone awry. After taking office, Creuzot engaged in what many view as a dereliction of duty, significantly changing how prosecutors handle crime in the jurisdiction. He refused to prosecute low level crimes that he claimed were based on need...and that backfired because the victims more often than not were Black owned businesses that were already struggling. The most striking aspect of this “reform” has been a gross mismanagement that led to felons essentially walking free, only to commit greater crimes, including capital murder. This isn’t just a failing on an individual level; it’s indicative of a broader agenda that, while cloaked in the rhetoric of social justice, undermines the basic tenets of law and order. In what can only be termed a perverse irony, the very communities that Soros purports to help are the ones most impacted by these policies. Increased crime rates and community instability are the real-world outcomes of a philosophy that, in practice, is out of touch with the complexities of crime and punishment.

The Soros-funded initiatives, bear the initial appearance of being well-intended, result in policies that destabilize communities and weaken the social fabric. In short, the philanthropy appears to be doing more harm than good. This is a pattern of behavior that he engages in because this is how he gets rich; he shorts economies and leaves us to handle the debt. Is it any wonder that a growing number of citizens question whether these progressive agendas truly serve the public interest, or if they are simply fueling a cycle of crime and decay?

The Fine Line Between Philanthropy and Exploitation

One could ask, why would these billionaires be interested in shaping the social and educational landscape of Black Dallas? Is it a genuine philanthropic pursuit or a well-calculated strategy to further their own agendas? The answer might not be black and white, but their influence is coloring our lives in shades we never asked for.

The Dubious Motive: Profit or Prejudice?

We can’t conclusively say whether these billionaires’ motives are steeped in racism, a hunger for profit, or a toxic cocktail of both. But let’s be clear: motive matters less when the impact is devastating. If you set my house on fire, it doesn’t matter whether you did it because you hate me or because you wanted to collect insurance; I’m still homeless. When you destabilize a blue collar economy by coddling criminals and letting a District Attorney distribute a deck of get out of jail free cards, it inevitably comes back to haunt us.

Conclusion: Reclaiming the Driver’s Seat

Dallas shouldn’t be a playground for the wealthy to test their social theories or pump up their credentials. This is about lives, not likes. It’s about families and futures, not funding some fantasy land that sounds great on paper, but doesn’t exist when we examine the fundamentals.

If we’re going to talk about educational freedom and responsible policing, then let it be a dialogue between different perspectives and not a monologue of an entrenched monopoly that whose primary focus is securing more funding to justify underperforming schools that fail to provide decent outcomes for students. The elitists needs to understand that we know their revenue comes at a price and if it undermines our choices, jeopardizes our safety and puts families at a disadvantage then we can learn to do without them.

It’s high time we take back the reins and direct our destiny, rather than be directed.

Fund initiatives for educational freedom, public safety and be a part of bringing back the Black entrepreneurial/owner/business class.

From there we are more than capable of handling the rest.